Posts Tagged ‘sexual morality’

For those that think “Friends with Kids” does not promote this, see the (secular) movie review at the bottom.

In July, 2009, Newsweek ran a feature article on “relationships with multiple, mutually consenting partners,” entitled, “Polyamory: The Next Sexual Revolution.” Last week, Showtime launched a reality TV show called “Polyamory: Married and Dating.” To quote from Newsweek’s 2009 article, it’s “enough to make any monogamist’s head spin.” And all this, of course, is being touted as a great thing, a celebration of love and freedom, a deliverance from the monotony and constraints of monogamy.

The Showtime promo [warning: sick content] pulls no punches and makes no excuses:

Narrator: The polyamorous lifestyle may shock some. But with American divorce rates hovering around 50 percent, these families are on the front line of a growing revolution in the traditional monogamous relationship.

Michael: I want people to know it’s okay to live a life this way, it can be good. Because it is. It’s beautiful. We love it.

Jennifer: I want people to know that monogamy isn’t the only way.

Vanessa: If it were socially acceptable, I think there would be way more poly people.

Tahl: It feels like how we really should all be living.

Natalia Garcia, director: I really believe that a lot of people are going to watch this show and their jaws are going to drop. And they’re also probably going to wonder, Am I poly?

Narrator: Follow two not-so-typical families –

Kamala: Mommy and Daddy are going to ask Jen and Tahl to come and live with us. How would you like that?

Kid: Yeah. I like ‘em.

Narrator: – that are changing the way America thinks about love.

Yes, it’s all about who we love, a statement we’ve heard before – repeatedly – in another context. Perhaps President Obama needs to allow his views on marriage to “evolve” just a little bit more? After all, don’t all Americans have the “right” to be with the person (or persons) they love? – Source

Secular movie review:

Although the movie does capture this characteristic of parenting, it actually focuses on a concept that some may find controversial: two people who are friends, but not lovers, having a child together so they can experience the joys of parenthood without the perceived pains of a monogamous relationship.

The film starts with a cell phone ringing, and the clock reveals it is very early in the morning. Jason Fryman (Adam Scott of NBC’s “Parks and Recreation”) answers the call from Julie Keller (Jennifer Westfeldt, who also wrote and directed the film) asking him a joking question regarding ways he would prefer to die. Fryman’s response and the ensuing conversation immediately gives the audience the idea that Fryman and Keller are the best of friends and sets a comedic tone that is prevalent throughout the film.

Fryman and Keller make clear their parenting beliefs right from the onset: everyone is doing it wrong. Their mutual friends are two married couples, Alex (Chris O’Dowd) with Leslie (Maya Rudolph) and Ben (Jon Hamm) with Missy (Kristen Wiig), who have had tremendous problems keeping their lives together since they had children. Using their friends and the general American population as examples, Fryman and Keller determine that their concept of child rearing while in a polyamorous relationship is superior to the standard, monogamous relationships most couples in America culture choose. Their concept skips the fighting and the inevitable divorce and goes straight to a shared custody system. With Fryman being a sex addict, Keller’s biological clock ticking and both of them wanting kids, the decision to conceive was not difficult.

What is scary about this concept is that many Americans growing up in families torn apart by divorce relate to this situation and many viewers might see this system as a real solution to their problems.

Check out Line of Fire Radio. Listen to full audio here.

Download audio segment 1 & segment 2.


The following ad was printed in the Canadian National Post. Most of you (if you’re not living in the US) would be shocked that these things are taught to kids of this age.

…the above audio continues to discuss, according to secular reasoning why / if polygamy is worse than homosexuality.

…and then they apologised for printing the ad! 😦

There is immense pressure (as can be seen from this article “Homosexual agenda can’t make ‘fearless one’ tremble”) from the pro-gay lobby in the US & Canada. This is why an ad like this is not allowed to run unchallenged.


“What sorrow for those who say that evil is good and good is evil, that dark is light and light is dark, that bitter is sweet and sweet is bitter.” – Isaiah 5:20

Fire Radio. Listen to full audio here.

Quote: “Sexual education classes at NYC public high schools and middle schools might feature some usually unmentioned lessons next year. [Among those lessons are porn and other things we’d rather not repeat in this post.] According to the report, the Department of Education has recommended students learn “everything there is to know about sex” in the new curriculum. The new lessons could make their way into classrooms as soon as this spring, as well as a free condom program at every NYC public school, as sex education is becoming more commonplace in schools — and among younger students. D.C. Public Schools announced last month, in a move that’s the first of its kind in the country, that students in grades 5, 8 and 10 will be administered standardized tests on sexuality, contraception and drug use.” Huffington Post

Line of Fire Radio. Listen to full audio here.